Welcome to our Blog where we delve into some of the most interesting aspects of Just Culture.
Learning from Incidents - Objections from Lawyers and Insurers
Can we learn from incidents if our lawyers or insurers say no? After a near miss, safety failure or serious incident we should seek to understand what happened, why it happened, and how can we prevent it from happening again. It sounds straightforward, but many organisations hesitate to investigate. Why? Because legal and insurance advisors often warn that uncovering failures might increase liability. While these concerns are valid, choosing ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต to investigate might protect the organisation ๐ต๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ข๐บ - but at the cost of ๐ต๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ธโ๐ด safety and resilience. In this blog post, we explore how organisations can navigate this tension between legal caution and a culture of learning.
Objections to Just Culture from Regulators & Lawyers
One of the challenges when implementing a Just Culture is addressing objections from regulators and lawyers, especially in highly regulated industries. These objections can often arise from misconceptions of what Just Culture is or perceived incompatibilities with other needs. It can also come from the challenges Just Culture can present to the presuppositions held by some lawyers. This article talks about some of these objections and how they can be addressed.
Not having a Just Culture could be putting your business at legal risk
A Just Culture has always been a great thing to have, but is fast becoming a must have. New psychosocial hazard laws require employers to safeguard their employeesโ mental health, just as they would their physical health.
This article explains these hazards and outlines how a Just Culture can eliminate or mitigate the risks arising from them.